Leaderboard

yes, always in stock. i was bamboozled on this set. thought Gina was getting cancelled. i think they turned up production on this set to 11.

i was selling 10758 from May - August for $114.99. i could go on and on. the only set that is selling much more from the summer is hp quidditch match - that set is appreciating quickly now. i was selling trex mech battles for $249 in august now under $200. unless you have an ton of crap to move, the holidays are the worst time to sell due to increased fees/shipping cost and increased return percentage and exploding sellers coming out of hibernation (hopefully go back soon). for me the holidays are time to unload the 75% off clearance and the duds.

These are two different sets [emoji848][emoji848] Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bowser's Castle $74.99 (25% off) https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/lego-super-mario-bowsers-castle-boss-battle-expansion-set-71369-lego/1137257591?ean=0673419319515

Terry’s tale made our Hall of Fame thread

Next B&P order ... These are awesome! Sent from my LG-TP450 using Tapatalk

I understand why everyone wants to use the PPP ratio, but sometimes it just doesn't fully reflect accurately what you are getting with some of these larger sets. (According to the weights on bricklink) 75192 Millennium falcon: 13150 grams / 28.99 lbs = $27.60 per lb of plastic 75252 Imperial Star Destroyer: 12480 grams / 27.51 lbs = $25.45 per lb of plastic 75313 AT-AT: 10708 grams / 23.61 lbs = $33.88 per lb of plastic 75309 Republic Gunship: 5620 grams / 12.39 lbs = $28.25 per lb of plastic I do find it interesting though that the AT-AT comes out to a good chunk higher price for the amount of material you get in the set. We all know there is the huge Disney/Star Wars tax, but I do agree that the AT-AT does appear to be unnecessarily expensive. I think that at the price of $700 it would be a bit more of a reasonable deal. That said, I did buy the set, and it's a beautifully big set as well, but I can understand why the idea of it being too expensive comes from. Sure, if you want to factor in inflation from 2017 the Millennium falcon would cost roughly $907 in todays rates. Which roughly equals out too $31.29 per lb of plastic. In all honesty, in those terms, the AT-AT really isn't that bad of deal. (obviously this is all subjective and everyone's value of worth is completely different.) But this puts it a little better in perspective about where Lego is coming up with the prices, and in all honestly, isn't super out of the line for them and still within reason for the other massive UCS sets that Lego has released recently. For comparison of other big sets: 10276 Colosseum: 10780 grams / 23.76 lbs = $23.15 per lb of plastic 10294 Titanic: 14000 grams / 30.86 lbs = $20.41 per lb of plastic

I have been pretty dormant on Brickpicker.com for several years. Funny that the steamroller is still being discussed!

Latest fun game is seeing how many orders go through before TP sees it and drops price further. They've done fantastic job murdering the Jurassic World line this Christmas.

Not sure who would buy it?

it is fine , was slow for like 20 min

Nothing to set the world on fire but at SAH, you now get the Flower Cart (30413) with $40 in spending. Not sure if it's restricted themes but works with HP. When it was first available, HP wasn't included.

We had Arlo prior to Eufy, and did like it. But I liked that everything is stored locally with Eufy. I don’t need to archive anything unless I know something happened. Since we bought a new house, we were given a free trail offer with Vivint. It was a cellular based system, so no concerns about WiFi issues.

One problem with Ring is if they are wireless very easy to jam and spray with compressed air and pretty much useless. Someone stole a car recently from my neighbors warehouse and I have cameras on both our units and they jammed the wifi signal and sprayed them as backup. Wired would be best for backup. If you ran through the ring alarm in theory you should get a notification that wifi went out but my alarm is hardwired and was just using ring cameras. Only downfall I can see. Freezes the lens and makes them all look like cracked glass until they thaw out the next morning.

It’s nice that he actually BUYS the product. Many of these guys are getting the sets for free from LEGO. Some of them are better than others, but many of them come off as schills. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I just tell them I agree. I'd never pay that much either.

I sent in my 75929 when the going rate was $159.99. It's $128 right now thanks to Toy Planet. SMH. Even though I typically only send in sets that have retired for at least 2 years, even those struggle at the moment. Just went in and did a massive "match the buybox" adjustment - luckily that immediately resulted in several sales, but at a lower price point than where I had hoped to sell based on where prices were over the summer. Glad I sold a bunch in September before the mad holiday rush started. I hope January will be better.

Nobody on BL is reporting any shipping notices for round 1 worldwide yet. USA is supposed to be delayed until 2/22 per BL team. I am thinking these will only be made at 1 factory “S or O” and then be shipped over.

Stopped into local LEGO store again today, the retiring exclusives (Barracuda, Corner Garage, Upside Down, Roller Coaster, etc) are all being restocked pretty deeply. Gingerbread House, Aston Martin, and Harley I did NOT see as being restocked.

did anyone get shipping notices from round one? my cc was charged last week and i got a buncha fedex shipping notices today sayung lego dropshipped items are coming my way....but those just might be from my walmart raya drgaon sets

Just got this email...

Actually 60307 have dipped below 50eur here a couple of times recently. I have problems selling the set but may part it out and just sell the rest without the elephant. On b&p the head is now on sale but not the body. Think it will work out to be about 15ish?

Apparently, after more than a year of disciplinary actions, Target has decided to lift my ban. When I was banned originally, I was receiving the auto-emails and cancelled orders. Tried different things, but the only way I was able to get a second account working was to use a different email, different CC, and an incognito browser window. Same name, same address, didn't seem to care. Also, goes without saying, didn't link Target Circle account to the new account. Since then, that account worked fine, and I've been staying below the radar on that one. My wife also created an account for herself on her phone with the Target app, and has been placing all sorts of orders there -- different CC numbers for her -- without any problems. So, last night I went to place a couple of small LEGO orders with the second account, except I placed them on the Target app by mistake (I would still use the app in-store on the banned account if needed for Target circle in-store discounts). Instantly cancelled due to a "technical problem". Got the usual email associated with banned accounts -- those emails come before the purchase confirmation email, they are so efficient these days. I'm thinking I just messed up by tying the accounts together through the app. So, I try the exact same orders using the incognito browser window and time-tested workaround. They went through without being cancelled. This morning, those orders are still in processing, but haven't been cancelled. Now I'm thinking, "can I use the old account in a browser window instead of the app?". Log into that account, verify it's the same account -- cancelled orders galore in my order history, check! Place the same order as the non-banned account using my paypal account. Bada-bing! No cancellations. However, this is on a PC and not my phone -- in the past, it didn't seem to matter which device (I could place the second account orders on a PC and they would still go through). Figuring I've got nothing to lose, let's try it with the red card... Also went through! Again, same different PC, although this PC had been used to place orders on the banned account as well. Now, my IP address has changed at home, but even an incognito window originates from the same IP address, so that shouldn't matter. And the second account went from working fine, to ban orders, to working fine again. The common elements here now just seems to be the Target app. From what I can tell on Target's website, Target Circle is tied to the account. So, it's not avoidable. And that seems to be true even in a regular browser window. So, is there something tied to the Target app itself? I'm going to have to try some other combinations with non-incognito browsers on the same phone and maybe other devices. Maybe also try deleting the app and reinstalling it and using the original account. I could also try the original account on an ipad I have that I know I've never placed an order on. Anyways, for those who have had your Target accounts hard banned in the past, there might be a glimmer of hope. If you have a banned account you haven't used in a while, maybe give it a go and report back.

@amz LEGO Star Wars at-ST Raider 75254 Building Kit (540 Pieces) $39.99

Or go deep on 60302 and 60307. 60307 is 35% off at Meijer at the moment (after Santa Bucks). 60302 is 31% off after SB. Lots of other animals you could sell off to bring the cost down (lions, crocodiles, monkeys etc).

someone in his household

@BrickLegacy ?

Well, that's an a-hole price.

I am using the ring ecosystem. I think it's great on a few different levels. The subscription is relatively inexpensive for the value you get with it (warranty and discount in the store). I believe Ring will be around for a long time, which is very important for me. Their products can be wired in many instances along with PoE capabilities on some. Integrates with Ring Alarm system. Cooperates with most Smart home products. If I were doing it all again I'd stick with Ring 100%.

Arlo doesn't require a subscription up to five cameras. We use it, but now I have seven cameras and the subscription, but also have online storage. I used to archive locally to a 1gb thumb drive before. It's been a good one for us. The cameras are all wireless and the base station requires a direct Cat6 connection to your Wi-Fi router.

Man, that just sucks. Personally, I like Eufy out of all of them. No subscription fee.

I mainly use FBM for opportunistic sales when its too late for FBA. Seems to me FBM is more a control thing for people. I get the screwups by Amazon with FBA and scams, but it seems time saved makes up for all that with FBA. Don't know if I'm right but its my impression anyway. Holy Crap! Speaking of opportunistic sales, T2 is going for almost $300 right now. Also never realized the RRP is $180.

About to lose MY SH*T on Zavvi right now. lol Bought the MILF from them on OCTOBER 15TH!!! They mysteriously "shipped" it with no tracking and I gave them a month before reaching out to CS about my product (or lack of). After a week of back and forth telling them how didn't arrive (and I've checked with my neighbors) they agreed to give me a refund as they cannot give me a replacement (which is hilarious seeing people get theirs from Black Friday). Now they have raised it to their financial team for the past TWO WEEKS and still no refund.... I got no money and no MILF (should be a t-shirt) 😑

Yes, there are very few TRUE reviewers of LEGO sets. I am a strong believer in Conflict of Interest...ANYONE that gets something for free is not going to be able to be objective...the mere fact they pretend to be so is a huge mislead. In most other fields someone getting the product for free is a huge No No...consider reading an Amazon review or a Yelp review that starts w/ "so I got it for free/ YUP most folks stop reading right there. Its a sham really. Props to Jang. That said Jang's pet peeves are not everyone's pet peeves, so his constant fixation on certain elements can get a bit whiney; but he is consistent and his longevity makes him an excellent resource. He's also Local, well representing the Bay, CA, Americans, and Human Beings in general

My brother in-law works for one of the big trucking companies. They cannot keep up with the demand at all. Not enough drivers, not enough trucks, not enough warehouse space. All of the companies are in the same situation. We will likely continue to see the effect of supply-chain issues for the next 6 months at least

Could be the one dumb seller that actually responded to the question on the listing as to why the price was so high. Just dumb to try and justify their price increase to a complaining consumer. Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk

I’d be curious to see if the big boys would take action to oppose this. These efforts are an assault on their business as well as ours. Bezos is just as likely to think “If anyone is going to harm my third party sellers it’s going to be me. Mwah-ha-ha.”

Any thoughts on why just one ( or a small minority ) seller got the letter so far ? It is pretty easy with the way Amazon displays the names and addresses to just blanket everyone with a letter. Bricklink is also an interesting case though I am no legal expert

Lego Systems Inc. is the name of the legal entity in the U.S. that sells LEGO products. The letter isn't saying that the recipient is selling knockoffs or counterfeits, but is saying that he is misappropriating the LEGO trademark by selling LEGO products outside of LSI's authorized distribution channels. The underlying theory is that LSI takes measures within its authorized distribution channel to ensure the quality of its products and the consumer experience, and that any products sold outside of that channel have been altered because they don't come with the same set of assurances that products sold within the channel come with. I was not familiar with this line of argument before seeing the post about this letter over the weekend, but it does appear that courts have accepted it and found trademark infringement in similar situations. If TLG is serious about getting better control over the online sale of its products, my guess is that we would likely see them add some type of warranty to their products in the coming years that doesn't extend beyond the initial sale of the product. Doing so would provide a much stronger legal foundation for this approach. As much as many of us may want to, I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss the threat that this poses. You really don't need to look any farther than threads like the one about counterfeits being sold on WM this year or the multitude of posts over the years about sellers getting customer returns that have been tampered with to know that there are plenty of facts that TLG can marshal to document why it is so critical for them to ensure that each product that reaches the hands of a consumer has not passed outside of its authorized distribution channels. Did the guy who received the letter sell much older LEGO that had already retired? If this effort is focused on people reselling current product, that would be a much different situation than if it is broader and includes people selling retired product as well. I suspect we should get an idea of which way this is heading pretty quickly given that many of us here should get a similar letter if they're taking the broader approach.

From what my IANAL mind can make from this letter: He seems to be selling something that LEGO ("LSI" although I never heard of that acronym - I only know TLG) does not produce themselves, and marks it as LEGO. Perhaps one of his listings got flagged for being suspected counterfeit? Or perhaps he sells parted out LEGO sets in custom listings (e.g. minifigures from sets which LEGO does not sell individually)? The extracts shown hint at selling items outside of the bundle LEGO has themselves QA'd, and they cannot take that liability to their brand name.

So what can you tell us about the recipient's business? How large of an operation are they running? Are they quick-flipping new sets or reselling older retired sets? How long have they been selling? Do they sell throughout the year or only sporadically (i.e., primarily Q4)? What kind of volume are they pushing through Amazon in either units or dollars or both? I'm just curious what caused this person to bubble up and get the letter now versus others. One last question...any chance the person that received the letter lives in Colorado?

The person who received this C&D letter should contact an attorney in order to properly respond to it. That person should be able to find online references for lawyers who are specialized in trademarking and copyrighting and who have experience defending Amazon sellers against such practices. No matter how outrageous the claims look like in this letter unfortunately they come from a legitimate lawyer firm hence there is a real risk of a lawsuit. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That letter is consistent with the arguments that they've made on behalf of other manufacturers in court. It remains to be seen whether TLG wants to put this theory of trademark infringement to the test on its products or whether it is simply doing this to scare some segment of the reseller population into backing off, but I wouldn't dismiss this letter as a black-hat tactic. I will say, though, that the law firm missed out on the opportunity to turn up the a-holeishness of the letter to 11 by sending it a week later and demanding a response no later than 5pm on 12/24.

That’s all I can find. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Who still has 3 to 5 year old stock? 🤣 That's cause you went out and bought it yesterday.

For me its been a combination of: Restock limits were a complete surprise and screwed up my purchasing plans for the year. Toys and games gate and LEGO gate is more or less gone now so there's a ton of new and bad sellers. LEGO has their inventory under better control than previous years. Way fewer quick flip options than in years past.