Leaderboard

Mine are processing as well. I have absolutely no problem with them increasing the production for later waves and changing the customer order limit, but I think it's unfair to those of us who crowdfunded with the understanding that this would be a limited product. I was not fully sold on the castle but knowing that I could own (and maybe flip...) a very limited LEGO set was part of the appeal. I also know that casual LEGO fans are upset but... the castle was still available to order for 40 minutes. That's a massive amount of time for something with such a small print run. The time and date were heavily advertised. If LEGO actually cared about being "equal", then they wouldn't have limited the sets produced to just the first 5 funded either. Crazy.

I’ll be represented by the honorable attorney , Mr. Reese Cellar. Highly recommended

The World, post 2015

Yep. That’s exactly the reason I posted it. My wife likes to joke about my “Lego nerd board” However she and I both know The value of The different kind of diversities of experience that are here. (But don’t tell her about my four Castle in the Forest’s!)

The rules were set - LEGO made those rules - The rules were not hidden from anyone, and everyone lived by those rules - Changing them retroactively would be wrong. If they wish to change the rules going forward - perfectly fine. But if LEGO gives in to the whining babies (out of fear, not because it is right), it is shameful.

Hopefully they just do a we hear you and going forward these are the changes we are going to make: limit 1 for the first day(s), open it up to all countries that lego proper already ships to, not just the current 30, as that also seems to be a major complaint in the comments, and increasing it to 10K units per set as you are asking for 10K supporters but only making 5K sets. The castle wasn’t really that hard to get in comparison to other products if you weren’t sleeping. I think anyone preselling this now on eBay is foolish. And for all the people complaining about what they are “going for” on eBay I don’t see one sold listing as of yet. All of mine are processing none in warehouse.

If it isn't the entertainment industry being insensitive with its "political correctness", it's the tabloid channels and websites reporting on anything & everything labeled as being part of some "woke" agenda bringing others in to join their "rage against the world" anger rant (misery loves company after all). The name change to the galaxy's most ruthless bounty hunter is uninspiringly generic and was unnecessary. It's the Jabba's Palace set "controversy" from years ago all over again.

Forget the early bird getting the worm, now it is those who yell the loudest get they want. I hear those who missed out. I've been there too but I have never cried about it. I learned and adapted for the future. It seems many people do not want to learn or adapt. They just scream because they didn't get what they want. Talk about entitled...

Interesting post in the comments. Thought I'd add it here along with BrickLink/LEGO stated terms re production numbers

The new cape accessory looks great. If LEGO could dual color the part having black on the outside with red inside, it would be perfect for a vampire minifigure.

7682(B) Shanghai Chase (Blacktron) by OptimalControl

3183(B) Stephanie's Cool Convertible (Blacktron) by OptimalControl

I bet you a $1 Disney has some kind of Diversity & Inclusion Committee that goes down list of every IP they own and makes changes necessary to proactively avoid offending the public

It’s been called a similar name since 1980, but we can call it Slave 1 as long as we want to.

(31112) Transformer Benatar Ship by alanyuppie

(31088) Transformer Excavator by alanyuppie