Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/09/2016 in all areas
-
How many times have people to be told, jumping on Lego sets is a bad idea, the boxes get squashed.7 points
-
Big time Bricklink sell today - 2 parts, for a total 7 cents. Not a set, but I had to share the big time sell.7 points
-
Clearly the last production run? They'll keep making them as long as you buy 5 and 2.6 points
-
5 points
-
Bought a CL lot. A ton of Bionicle I don't care about, a number of Star Wars Mini sets, a UV damaged 7261 Clone Tank, and the one I really cared about, 10026 Naboo Fighter. I think I'm only missing the yellow antennas for the wings, two stickers are pealing a little, but unforunately no instructions. Everything for $2005 points
-
4 points
-
4 points
-
What the hell people? now everybody is finding out about it? Now, and I had 18 of them? Now, when I sold my last one last week?4 points
-
3 points
-
Finally got around to watching Ep. VII on DVD (rental) last weekend. Ugh. Even the new Sith dude is some kind of emo pretty boy with daddy issues. Makes me miss Jar-Jar & co. I don't think anything can save Ep. VII sets. As in the past, it's OT or bust.3 points
-
See I'd go with the opposite line of thinking. If you have a new playset that's not selling well, retire the alternatives to push customers towards your new product that you've invested in.3 points
-
YMMV but I found a bunch of older Lego sets in a different aisle near seasonal beach stuff this weekend. This included x2 Brick Bounty, many of the other pirates, knowhere escapes, sentinels, bike shops, double decker couches. Everything was at retail but there was a lot and in great condition. With some serious, SYW magic, I walked out with a pristine Brick Bounty for $36.25.2 points
-
2 points
-
People who argue over the phone while driving in highway, slow down the traffic, and/or almost hit other cars around them. If the freaking phone calls are that important, pull over and take them, you %R#@!$@! $#!%#$@ %$@%$@ @!# !!!!!!2 points
-
Over the years, TLG has been known to take many actions that don't fit neatly within the "logic" and "common sense" that has often prevailed on this board. For example, there was absolutely no way that TLG would retire the Haunted House before Halloween, but it did exactly that. Similarly, there was no possible way that TLG would retire R2-D2 before EPVII came out, but it did exactly that. Personally, I think that EV is done this year based solely on the box art. It is the last green box set on the market and has already outlasted all of the blue box sets and many of the tan box sets.2 points
-
Ok, so you quoted a sale which reeks of being dodgy. Yes, that's a great example of the roof falling in on the business.2 points
-
Minecraft The Village 21105 - FBA $64 Bought on EBay for $27 a couple weeks ago.2 points
-
Lego City Square, 60097, at Kmart for $139. It's been that price for a while, but pair with a 10 off $75 toys coupon from the mobile coupon site (https://m.kmart.com/promos/ecoupons) + any other points magic and you can get it for under $120. Link to the set: http://www.kmart.com/lego-174-city-square-60097/p-004W007458728001P?prdNo=16&blockNo=16&blockType=G162 points
-
Today, we are going back in time to almost three years ago (time flies!) and taking a look at one set that had the forums and the entire LEGO community talking almost non-stop: the LEGO Technic 4x4 Crawler Exclusive Edition. Unlike the majority of LEGO sets released throughout the years, the Limited Edition Crawler was designed through a fan base contest, with one of the conditions being that the creators utilized the chassis of the 9398 Crawler. The winner model was to be selected and produced as a limited edition of only 20,000 copies. Even since the winner was announced, investors and collectors were excited about the possibility of getting their hands in what many saw as a highly collectible set. Whether it was for resale, long term holding or just for personal collection reasons, the expectation was that such a unique set was bound to be extremely hard to acquire at retail price ($199.99). Months after the announcement, on August 1st 2013, the set was finally released to the public on LEGO Shop at Home and brick and mortar locations. As many expected, and worried about, 41999 sold out online the very same day, forcing customers to either hunt the set at retail location or source it from the secondary market. As one would expect, the hype surrounding the set meant that most brick and mortar locations sold out as soon as they put the set on the shelves. In turn, prices on eBay and other online platforms rose to close to $450, with sets selling within minutes of being listed as collectors worried about it becoming even more expensive, investors hoped for the next $1,000 set and, as some of you might remember, some even attempted to corner the market by acquiring dozens of copies a day. While I will not get into it, it is also worth mentioning that the circumstances surrounding the set generated a lot of controversy, and ethical/moral discussions popped up almost daily on some of the forum threads. In theory, it all made sense; LEGO released a set that was not designed by your traditional LEGO design team, limited it to 20,000 copies worldwide and, to top it off, included a number of rare and unique elements that increased collectability (first Technic set to use dark blue, chrome elements and a uniquely numbered license plate). Furthermore, the box and instruction manuals were both higher quality than average and added a little bit of value to the set. It had all the potential in the world to become an extremely sought after and expensive set in the long term, but as you can see from the chart below, in the end that was not the case. The set has almost completely stagnated at around $360, the price it finally settled at a couple months after the hype died down at the end of 2013. That’s a close to 0% gain for anyone who has been holding the set for the last 2 or so years! Clearly, the weeks after release were the most profitable times to sell the Limited Edition 41999. I sold some of these within this timeframe and took advantage of the hype surrounding it, but at the same time thought that the set had a lot of long term potential (as many others did!). Looking back though, the performance of the set has not been anything but a disappointment. While it is always hard to pinpoint the exact reasons a set is not as popular as expected, I think that there are some generally accepted factors that contributed to the Crawler not doing as well as expected. Technic has always been a niche market. While there is definitely a following to the theme, its popularity is nowhere near as close to some of the licensed themes, reducing the customer base. The set on which 41999 was based on, 9398 Crawler, was readily available until 2015. Given the similarities between the two sets, having a much cheaper version in the market could have definitely impacted the performance of the Limited Edition. The set simply grew too fast, reaching maturity shortly after its release. All the circumstances surrounding the set allowed it to reach its ceiling way faster than the average LEGO set, explaining the lack of growth since. So, knowing its past, what should we look forward to? Honestly, I don’t see how the trend can be reversed. I would not expect to see any significant growth out of this set, as I believe that if its unique characteristics have not generated any more interest in the past couple of years, there is no reason to believe they will in the future. Don’t get me wrong, this is still a cool model and a very interesting piece of LEGO history, so there is definitely a value in owning it. But if you are still holding it with the expectation of above average result, I would definitely take a few moments to reconsider and compare it with some of the better options currently available. Thanks for reading!1 point
-
As a proud employee of Frito Lay, I'd say you made a GREAT choice on those pretzels. The $49 Tydirium wasn't all that bad either.1 point
-
I've seen this at several WM for $99 (rrp is $129), but never at $64. That would be more than 50% off. I'd buy all of these at over 50% off. Do you possibly have this set confused with the First Order Transporter which has been found at $64, and most recently $45 (rrp is $89)?1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
I honestly haven't seen a good deal at Walmart in store in so long that I don't even bother anymore. I've wasted too many trips to my local stores only to find regularly priced items in their clearance section. goodluck to others.1 point
-
SACRILEGE...do not ever -- and I mean ever -- debase the greatest character ever in the history of Star Wars lore in my presence. I will not stand for it. But, now that I think about it, there's not much I can do about it so carry on1 point
-
Anyone who says that Kylo Ren is a better character than Jar Jar Binks is a complete and total moron. Jar Jar forever!1 point
-
1 point
-
To all the sellers currently offering these on eBay, THESE ARE NOT SERIES 16! If you're not suggesting this is, this is not intended for you. If you are, you're an idiot...1 point
-
1 point
-
Yes, just purchased some at Meijer today. I was honestly surprised to even see them there this early. However, I found the display case sitting sideways in the regular lego aisle mixed in with other sets and no shelf tag. There were only about 10 bags left. I have never seen minifigs in the lego aisle here as they are always in a shelf bin on the end cap of an aisle. There were also two empty cardboard boxes (that the sealed display case ships in) sitting on the shelf as well which were labeled Disney minifigures/Do not open until May 1st. I was just there on Friday evening and they were no where to be found. Interesting how in a day or so these magically appear, but only 10 out of 120 are left. On top of that every popular character was missing (ursula, maleficent, mickey/minnie, donald/daisy, etc.). I picked up a few of the less desirable characters in an attempt to complete my set, but still need Minnie, Donald, Daisy, and Alien.1 point
-
1 point
-
41999 was a bargain as it contained more PF parts than 9398 for the same price. At retail it was a very good deal for Technic MOCers but not at inflated prices.. Also, 9398 isn't regarded as an uber collectible set so your pool of people looking those complete a collection is smaller than those who collect Technic construction sets. Plus it's technic which already has a smaller audience. That said, it's an excellent set and the build doesn't disappoint. The body used some tried and true technic build techniques but also a few clever ones to achieve the right angles for the rear window. Hands down my fav is the opening doors. It's a great set and a bargain at current prices for collectors.1 point
-
1 point
-
The 41999 thread was the most active thread at the time and grew to many pages, probably faster than any other topic. Flippers were frothing out of every orifice.1 point
-
Personally, as someone who did not pay close attention to the Lego market for many years, and just got back into the game in Jan. ,I had no idea this set existed until the reveal of the Porsche 911 set, and people started debating that sets investment value. If I as someone who reads the vast majority of threads and comments from Jan. to now on BP has only recently heard of this set, how is the average AFOL supposed to know about it? It isn't licensed and it is not part of a series or line. Truly only the Technic fans would have a good idea that the set exists, or if you were an AFOL when it hit the market. If that was the case, you likely tried to buy one when you had a chance at retail, or bought in at the initial surge at EOL, hence the stagnate growth. As stated above, being in the Technic line did not help the case for this set either.1 point
-
Don't be silly, this thread would be enlivened by a bit of tumbleweed1 point
-
12€ Galeria Coupon give-away: http://www.brickeven.de/lego-deals/galeria-13-rabatt-auf-lego-creator-am-08-05-2016-12-e-gutscheine-gratis/1 point
-
The new vid he puts up where he combines this, the hoth attack set and the 2011 hoth set.... wow! That is a true echo base IMO. I'm tempted to say that if TLG released those 3 sets and removed the UCS logo....$350 no questions asked. I'd still be in the running at $400 i think.1 point
-
Kids' bday today - Got executive permission to build something too, so we built: 41122 Adventure Camp Treehouse (still unfinished), 30398 Adventure Bridge (both my daughter's projects), 75102 Poe's X-Wing (my son) and 21303 Wall-E (me, yay!). My son, ever the charmer, wanted to give his sister a present too so he bought the Rey constractible from me that I got during the May the 4th sale at LEGO.com for $6.50 (no, I did not upcharge ). She built it immediately (Rey is her favorite SW character). Here's our breakfast nook during these festivities:1 point
-
I haven't read this thread in awhile but what's up with these novels? I can't read more than like 2 or 3 sentences without nodding off...1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
I agree folks should divest their Lego investment portfolio. Kinda like retirement investments. Buying new and used retired sets can be a comparable strategy to adding bonds and low-risk stocks to your 401k. Investment yields might not be as high a buying sets prior to retirement but risk is less plus less storage space is required during set ownership. Investors should setup requirements that must be met prior to investing in post-retirement sets (new or used). Mine are... 1) should be a good deal compared to current secondary market price 2) needs to be a popular set / part of a popular theme 3) the set has a slim chance at being refreshed during my ownership. I began buying used and new retired sets 3 years ago when I wanted to fund my "build a great retired set, flip and buy another great set to build" strategy. It all started with a 10185 UCS Vader Tie Advanced that was purchasd for $95 and sold 4 months later for $250. Then flipped a couple of Indiana Jones and Batman 1 sets. After that, I rolled my profits into a $550 used 10181 Eiffel Tower that sold for $800 6 months later. Then I managed to score a $1,425 used in box 10179 UCS MF when it was selling for. $1,900. After that I flipped a $750 10196 a Grand Carousel and sold it 1 year later for. $1,450. The 10179 hasn't been flipped yet but I should be able to clear $2,500 in less than 2 years of ownership. I have done the same with new (NISB) sets since 2013. In mid-2013, I purchased a 10 lot of new The Zombies sets for. $1050. I just sold the 8th one for over $210. All sales have been for over $200. Also picked up 2 new 10221 SSDs for $500 each and as you mentioned, they are selling for almost $1,000 now. Another good one was buying a new in opened box Emerald Night for $260 and it's nearing $400 two years later. Not all purchases have been without loss though. I purchased two new Winter Toy Shops two years ago for $300 total and won't be getting my money back. With the proper strategy and some luck, @Fcbarcelona101 (and @ed_mack 's) strategy of buying retired sets can be a low risk / medium reward strategy.1 point
-
I'd rather have one of these than 4 AoH...1 point
-
Shhhh! We need people to feel comfortable they can make their money back if they pay more than RRP or the market will collapse. Ponzi rules.1 point
-
For the ones considering this deal, pm me, I can get you those for $120 all day long, when you get more than 10, price drops to $118 each.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
It does me but the horde has no concerns. Ignorance is bliss. Just buy buy buy on credit and all will be good. It's better than gold haven't you heard? All threads lead to the bubble thread....1 point
-
1 point