Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
It's capitalism at work folks. Free market and hence price is just a reflection of supply vs demand. There is no plan to eliminate the middle class, unless that plan is capitalism. Then yeah, let's get rid of capitalism. But the people complaining about the unfair effects of inflation tend to be the biggest proponents of capitalism.
It's like Ted Cruz (IIRC) decrying federal handouts and then asking for one as soon as his state gets hit with a national disaster. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Call me a commie, but the best way to protect the middle class is more government-controlled programs such as free healthcare, guaranteed minimum wage, social security that keeps people away from poverty, and with that (unfortunately but necessarily) higher taxes.
Flame away ...

Trust me I don’t think we need anymore govt control over anything but to think they aren’t eliminating the middle class by forcing small businesses to close and raising wages thus having more people rely on govt to get by is being blind. They want people begging for communism without calling it that. No flaming as it’s just a discussion and pretty sure we agree in most of it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Alpinemaps said:
Do you think that Mr. Baszucki, and his family, are paying a fair share of their tax, compared to us?  I'm not talking about making them pay above and beyond a percentage of what you and I pay.  But I am asking - do they pay at a same or similar rate of tax compared to their income/worth as you and I?  (Spoilers - no).


A whole new base tax system would be needed where you can’t hide all your income and I don’t think most people are for that. That’s one of the benefits of a business and rentals etc. real education is needed in this country and not this waste of education offered now. I doubt any of us in here actually pay the % of what we are supposed to once taxes are filed.
 

Posted
52 minutes ago, Alpinemaps said:

I'm not a fan of the phrase "higher taxes," but prefer "fairer taxes."

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/28/business/tax-break-qualified-small-business-stock.html

Do you think that Mr. Baszucki, and his family, are paying a fair share of their tax, compared to us?  I'm not talking about making them pay above and beyond a percentage of what you and I pay.  But I am asking - do they pay at a same or similar rate of tax compared to their income/worth as you and I?  (Spoilers - no).

It's bad. Really bad. Did you see Peter Thiel using a Roth IRA to accumulate $5 billion tax free? https://seekingalpha.com/news/3710024-how-did-peter-thiel-accumulate-5b-in-a-tax-free-roth-ira?gclid=Cj0KCQiAoNWOBhCwARIsAAiHnEjXK0PEX_XwBeQ70l25RDtdMAtqMwEMgirH-lUIEiTqp0cRUeuFLtQaAsqhEALw_wcB&utm_campaign=14049528666&utm_medium=cpc&utm_source=google&utm_term=137460309828^dsa-1455881688143^^555764444353^^^g

I think the bigger issue is societal. You speak to anyone at nearly any wage level and they fundamentally hate paying taxes and feel that they pay more than their share. It's extremely difficult to reform a system that most of the public fundamentally scorns.  

  • Like 2
Posted
53 minutes ago, chinothegeeko said:


Trust me I don’t think we need anymore govt control over anything but to think they aren’t eliminating the middle class by forcing small businesses to close and raising wages thus having more people rely on govt to get by is being blind. They want people begging for communism without calling it that. No flaming as it’s just a discussion and pretty sure we agree in most of it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Who is "they?"

Posted
5 hours ago, Alpinemaps said:

 


Record profits. Escalating salaries for CEOs. The rich keep getting richer.



That doesn’t make any sense to me. I don’t fundamentally care what you make. If you can make $30 instead of $20, good for you!

4aaa733e9225d1b914a89c1cc67b2f67.jpg

And there the rub. Fattest profits in 7 decades. And we’re worried about whether it’s appropriate to pay a living wage? Just because someone is in high school, doesn’t mean they don’t deserve it as well.

 

I hear you on being happy for others. Unfortunately, we'd be in the minority as most coworkers are naturally concerned with getting their cut.

Also, most talks seem to assume every company is some huge corporation with a CEO on top raking in the profits. I visualize the mom/pop shops who have an owner holding his own paycheck to make everyone else's payroll and feeling forced to bump his staff of 20-50 (bottom to top) with raises. The doors may close for these small businesses.

Posted
4 minutes ago, lodibricks said:

I hear you on being happy for others. Unfortunately, we'd be in the minority as most coworkers are naturally concerned with getting their cut.

Also, most talks seem to assume every company is some huge corporation with a CEO on top raking in the profits. I visualize the mom/pop shops who have an owner holding his own paycheck to make everyone else's payroll and feeling forced to bump his staff of 20-50 (bottom to top) with raises. The doors may close for these small businesses.

Absolutely.  But comparing say a mom and pop shop to Walmart, is like comparing you and me to Musk or Bezos.  It's not the mom and pops (or you and me) that are strangling the life out of workers in this country.

  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Phil B said:

It's capitalism at work folks. Free market and hence price is just a reflection of supply vs demand. There is no plan to eliminate the middle class, unless that plan is capitalism. Then yeah, let's get rid of capitalism. But the people complaining about the unfair effects of inflation tend to be the biggest proponents of capitalism.

It's like Ted Cruz (IIRC) decrying federal handouts and then asking for one as soon as his state gets hit with a national disaster. You can't have your cake and eat it too.

Call me a commie, but the best way to protect the middle class is more government-controlled programs such as free healthcare, guaranteed minimum wage, social security that keeps people away from poverty, and with that (unfortunately but necessarily) higher taxes.

Flame away ...

my issue w/ this post is that pure capitalism is devoid of government programs.

so your point is incorrect since the current US conditions include government programs such as minimum wage and social security, etc. 

  • Like 2
Posted
17 minutes ago, $20 on joe vs dan said:

my issue w/ this post is that pure capitalism is devoid of government programs.

so your point is incorrect since the current US conditions include government programs such as minimum wage and social security, etc. 

Student loans are a prime example.  If they did not exist, or the amount that students could borrow was substantially lower, I believe you would see tuition costs become more reasonable.  Schools would have to adapt to make up for the lack of money available.

There is a thought that the reason big companies pay low level employees less is that the government basically supplements their incomes with assistance programs.

So I agree, it's not truly a free market, and every time they try to correct it, there are unintended consequences.

Posted
Student loans are a prime example.  If they did not exist, or the amount that students could borrow was substantially lower, I believe you would see tuition costs become more reasonable.  Schools would have to adapt to make up for the lack of money available.
There is a thought that the reason big companies pay low level employees less is that the government basically supplements their incomes with assistance programs.
So I agree, it's not truly a free market, and every time they try to correct it, there are unintended consequences.

Student loans have gotten just out of hand. Interest rates are much higher than home interest rates. People are spending years making payments and barely making a dent in the principal.

If the government is giving loans for school, then they need to be simple interest, easy to pay off, so people can be productive! The government really shouldn’t be making bank on loan repayments.
Posted
3 minutes ago, Alpinemaps said:


Student loans have gotten just out of hand. Interest rates are much higher than home interest rates. People are spending years making payments and barely making a dent in the principal.

If the government is giving loans for school, then they need to be simple interest, easy to pay off, so people can be productive! The government really shouldn’t be making bank on loan repayments.

Tuition being so high is the problem, and as I said, I believe it's so high because money (student loans) is easily available to go to school.

The program for my degree was five years when I was in college.  This degree wasn't available elsewhere in the state or some of the neighboring states.  It is now more widely available and the school revised the program to four years.  So what used to take five years to teach now only takes four?  I call BS and gladly throw every alumni mailer I receive in the trash.  It's a racket and people need to stop buying into it.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Mathew said:

Amazon price gouging?

 

4E0B7573-7BD1-45D9-B236-B3A145ABC194.png

pretty mild compared to when they were selling treehouse for $344.  so many sets amazon sells for over msrp i stopped counting them a while ago.

even better is when they start selling retired sets for over msrp like when they were selling 75248 for $38 a few months ago.

Edited by cladner
Posted
Just now, KvHulk said:

Dexter: New Blood - What a colossal waste of time.

I was thinking about this show today and thought I might need to start it sometime. I finished the original series, but I know some who didn't. Now I'm moving it out of my mind again.

Posted

Just finished listening to Ronan Farrow’s 7 episode Podcast “Catch and Kill” that goes into his reporting on Harvey Weinstein

My complaint is Harvey. He is filthy. He is a disgusting human being. 80+ woman came forward to detail the assaults and rapes committed against them. He is vile and my anxiety shot through the roof just listening to it.

It’s a fantastic podcast. But Harvey himself can just die.

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

I'd like to start a movement that we start calling people like Harvey, a raper.  Rapist is too closely related to distinguished words like Artist, Scientist, Psychologist, Dentist, Phlebotomist, Ophthalmologist, etc..  It should be more closely related to words like murderer, killer, abuser, cheater, etc.  I will be using the term Raper from now on to help the movement. Harvey is nothing but a sicko raper.   💩

Edited by BricksBrotha
typo
  • Like 3
Posted
19 hours ago, Alpinemaps said:

My complaint is Harvey. He is filthy. He is a disgusting human being. 80+ woman came forward to detail the assaults and rapes committed against them. He is vile and my anxiety shot through the roof just listening to it.

What is amazing is that everyone knew, and would simply laugh about it openly (while continuing to show him honor/respect).

Weinstein was/is a truly sick monster. But this movement has grouped every powerful man who pursued sexual encounters into monsters, which much more often than not was not the reality of what took place.

Posted
19 minutes ago, KShine said:

What is amazing is that everyone knew, and would simply laugh about it openly (while continuing to show him honor/respect).

Weinstein was/is a truly sick monster. But this movement has grouped every powerful man who pursued sexual encounters into monsters, which much more often than not was not the reality of what took place.

Worse, they profited over the situation by getting more money, fame, and/or power.  From Meryl Streep to Kevin Smith and everyone in that sick industry

Posted
On 1/9/2022 at 7:12 PM, Mark Twain said:

RIP Bob Saget.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sad, just a few months after his best friend, Norm Macdonald (RIP).  His eulogy for Norm was heartbreaking.  It is somewhere on Youtube.

Little known fact (or is it widely known?), his potrayal of calm mannered Danny Tanner on Full House was complete 180 from his stand ups.  I listened to 1 of his specials a while back and it was filthy AF.     

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, BricksBrotha said:

I'd like to start a movement that we start calling people like Harvey, a raper.  Rapist is too closely related to distinguished words like Artist, Scientist, Psychologist, Dentist, Phlebotomist, Ophthalmologist, etc..  It should be more closely related to words like murderer, killer, abuser, cheater, etc.  I will be using the term Raper from now on to help the movement. Harvey is nothing but a sicko raper.   💩

 

  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...