justafrog Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 My point was that on retired sets (that are no longer available at retail) would not be able to be fulfilled by Amazon. But it is likely that I do not fully understand how FBA works. Please disregard my previous post due to my ignorance. FBA/Fulfilled by Amazon simply means that Amazon is acting as the shipper for stock that is provided to them by the third party seller. It isn't stock that Amazon acquires from the manufacturer or a distributor and sells on Amazon's own behalf, it's stock that Amazon is sent by third-party sellers and shipped (upon sale) on THOSE people's behalf. Retired/non-retired has nothing to do with an item's eligibility for FBA. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Mack Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I was not aware of the backstory. I was reacting to forthofer comment " The manager of the store told me. Everything that particular manager has told me so far, has been true. " which sounded exactly like one of the posts hxckid88 made awhile ago (can't find one right know). But yeah, I bet hxckid88 does not have that highly collectible set :-) I know what you were reacting to and you have every right to question him, but I really didn't like the way you responded to him. This is what I was talking about the other day...CIVILITY. Jason knows people at LEGO and he had enough couth to not drop any names. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Mack Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 My fault is that i really didn't pay attention to the 23 he had listed. My bad, i will now go light all my big sets on fire. Everyone is much smarter than me. You are a "small set bigot." 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Mack Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Well, to my defense, he acted weak and vulnerable, by trying to defend his position. But now i see he might have some exclusive spinners to use... So if a person acts weak and vulnerable, attacking them is the way to respond? Thanks Machiavelli... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No More Monkeys Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 So if a person acts weak and vulnerable, attacking them is the way to respond? Thanks Machiavelli... Yes, that's how they do it on the internets. I am off to CNN comments section P.S. I will try to refrain from posting snarky (and hilarious to me) comments. You are trying to run serious investment site for adults here, after all 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Mack Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Yes, that's how they do it on the internets. I am off to CNN comments section P.S. I will try to refrain from posting snarky (and hilarious to me) comments. You are trying to run serious investment site for adults here, after all There is no accounting for taste. By the way...try real hard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hxckid88 Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I was not aware of the backstory. I was reacting to forthofer comment "The manager of the store told me.Everything that particular manager has told me so far, has been true. " which sounded exactly like one of the posts hxckid88 made awhile ago (can't find one right know). But yeah, I bet hxckid88 does not have that highly collectible set :-)I have no insider info. I posted what I was told. I stated this and did not mislead in anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Mack Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I have no insider info. I posted what I was told. I stated this and did not mislead in anyway. I agree with you. It is quite possible some LEGO store managers...and therefore some employees, are privy to some insider information. The hard part is figuring out which ones to believe and which ones to ignore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No More Monkeys Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I have no insider info. I posted what I was told. I stated this and did not mislead in anyway. I know... BTW, weren't you laughed at to death back then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Mack Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I know... BTW, weren't you laughed at to death back then? Isn't hxckid88 always laughed at? Sorry...I couldn't resist. Just be nice. I don't want to have to pull my Patrick Swayze video clip out! Sorry, I couldn't resist... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No More Monkeys Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Isn't hxckid88 always laughed at? Sorry...I couldn't resist. Just be nice. I don't want to have to pull my Patrick Swayze video clip out! Sorry, I couldn't resist... As long as we all agree that we don't have to be "civil" with hxckid88 , I am ok P.S. Isn't that hxckid88 , the guy who makes "c..s..r" comment?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzy_bricks Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Isn't hxckid88 always laughed at? Sorry...I couldn't resist. Just be nice. I don't want to have to pull my Patrick Swayze video clip out! Sorry, I couldn't resist... If being nice doesn't work, there is always throat rips. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Mack Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 As long as we all agree that we don't have to be "civil" with hxckid88 , I am ok P.S. Isn't that hxckid88 , the guy who makes "c..s..r" comment?? Deal. I was an E-Thug before I started following Patrick Swayze's philosophies. I know how hard it is to be nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No More Monkeys Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 If being nice doesn't work, there is always throat rips. I don't think we can use MacGruber references here - that would be not tasteful Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzy_bricks Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I don't think we can use MacGruber references here - that would be not tasteful I was carrying on the Patrick Swayze/Road House theme. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No More Monkeys Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I was carrying on the Patrick Swayze/Road House theme. Ah, right, that's when the time has come to not be nice :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Mack Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I don't think we can use MacGruber references here - that would be not tasteful Please stop. MacGruber? Not in the same league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevenplays Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 'CIVILITY', don't need to bring that topic back up again, do we? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnwray Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Emazers, I love your posts, your thoughts, and you in general. You've been friendly, wise, and generous with your time and expertise. But i think you're wrong here. As a FRIENDLY bet,,,, Let's put your one SSD for 399.99 against my 23 Umbaran Tank's i just picked up for 16.79 each. I'll let you pick the duration. 6 months, 12 months, whatever. We can use BrickPicker's valuation after that duration and see which was the better investment. Stakes are, the loser has to put "________ was right" in their signature file for a year. Sound good ? -oh and i fully recognize the extra work in packing & shipping extra sets (not in listing them, that's just extra quantity on your ebay page). So we can use whatever the BrickPicker contest used to account for that. Perhaps a 'service fee' per set sold. This sounds a LOT like the Warren Buffett $1,000,000 bet against Prot 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No More Monkeys Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 This sounds a LOT like the Warren Buffett $1,000,000 bet against Prot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpinemaps Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Isn't hxckid88 always laughed at? Sorry...I couldn't resist. Just be nice. I don't want to have to pull my Patrick Swayze video clip out! Sorry, I couldn't resist... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadowsk1 Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I'm not believing this, mainly because 78% of statistics are made up on the spot. (Oops! That makes it 79%) That sounds as promising as using sex panther cologne. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Mack Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 That sounds as promising as using sex panther cologne.100% guaranteed to work 60% of the time! Sent from my iPhone using Brickpicker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Mack Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 This sounds a LOT like the Warren Buffett $1,000,000 bet against Prot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Mack Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 'CIVILITY', don't need to bring that topic back up again, do we?I certainly hope not, but you never know. Sent from my iPhone using Brickpicker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.2388d65c77b4486ba81fd9fb9fdd1a00.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.