Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 2/9/2016 at 11:40 PM, rfish said:

"B", "T" and "O" also exist in Codes. No clue what factories they relate to.

B is rumoured to be Shenzhen, China and O I believe is Billund, Denmark

Edited by Crustybeaver
  • Like 1
Guest TabbyBoy
Posted

In that case, I'll avoid anything with "B" in the code like the plague. Sorry but, I've yet to see any "quality" product made in China that meets my exacting standards. Nevertheless, I'll not be buying any Ewok Villages and I think a lot of people may get burned if they buy these in quantity but, that's just me (the person that bought hundreds of Mars Rovers & Research Institiutes).

Posted (edited)

This (new UCS Hoth set) means EV will be retired right? I think this set is good news for investors with a lot of vehicles in stock, however I'm worried about the future.

Edited by jaisonline
Moved post into correct thread.
Posted
3 minutes ago, c_rpg said:

This (new UCS Hoth set) means EV will be retired right? I think this set is good news for investors with a lot of vehicles in stock, however I'm worried about the future.

What exactly are you worried about?  

Posted
2 minutes ago, jaisonline said:

What exactly are you worried about?  

Specifically I was talking about the whole 'focus on playing philosophy' people were talking about in the hoth ucs thread. I think most Star Wars collectors would prefer a set that has zero play value but is fun to build and looks really nice on display.

Posted

Specifically I was talking about the whole 'focus on playing philosophy' people were talking about in the hoth ucs thread. I think most Star Wars collectors would prefer a set that has zero play value but is fun to build and looks really nice on display.

I think folks will disagree with you. People are disappointed because that Hoth set is a letdown. Little value for $250. Expense sets (UCS or not) have been cut above the cheaper sets. The EV (as a whole) is night and day better than any previous Ewok. Collectors had the same expectations for the Hoth set.

Posted

Specifically I was talking about the whole 'focus on playing philosophy' people were talking about in the hoth ucs thread. I think most Star Wars collectors would prefer a set that has zero play value but is fun to build and looks really nice on display.

It is what it is. Being worried for playability is something pointless. EV is a playing set but none of us would have complained about it if it had been labeled as a UCS set simply because it is actually a good set. Display beautifulness does not mean 0 playability. There are few compromises here that could work with what LEGO does want to do in the future.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, jaisonline said:

I think folks will disagree with you.

Perhaps. A balance between play- and display value is best imo. However, one of the main qualities that make a UCS set is that they tend to look nicer than the standard sets. I think EV has that quality, while the new Hoth set does not. It's basically just a combination of some other sets, like people pointed out in the other thread.

Edited by c_rpg
Posted

Perhaps. A balance between play- and display value is best imo. However, one of the main qualities that make a UCS set is that they tend to look nicer than the standard sets. I think EV has that quality, while the new Hoth set does not. It's basically just a combination of some other sets, like people pointed out in the other thread.

I was updating my post while you were replying.

Posted
8 minutes ago, jaisonline said:

I was updating my post while you were replying.

Oops. Well, I just hope the next UCS set does not follow this trend and the quality is up to UCS level. 250$ is not cheap, but I'm sure they will sell a ton anyway :pardon:

It does seem likely that this will replace EV, right?

 

Posted
3 hours ago, c_rpg said:

Oops. Well, I just hope the next UCS set does not follow this trend and the quality is up to UCS level. 250$ is not cheap, but I'm sure they will sell a ton anyway :pardon:

It does seem likely that this will replace EV, right?

 

I cant believe how good the rrp for EV is now I've seen the Hoth set.  One way to generate more sales for Hoth would be retire its closes competitor (which I have to believe is EV) so likely this one is on its way out.  That said i still think its around for the next 6 months of reasonable availability before production is wound down at the end of the year.

  • Like 3
Posted
20 hours ago, Lego_Yoda said:

I cant believe how good the rrp for EV is now I've seen the Hoth set.  One way to generate more sales for Hoth would be retire its closes competitor (which I have to believe is EV) so likely this one is on its way out.  That said i still think its around for the next 6 months of reasonable availability before production is wound down at the end of the year.

Yeah, Assault on Hoth looks like a total mess/miss compared to Ewok Village. As a set EV in itself is coherent. If seen next to each other in store EV should easily come out ahead unless you're allergic to ewoks.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

I'm wondering, if Lego release a Cantina or a Cloud city in such big sets (like the EV and Hoth), maybe the EV will be extremely seeked after by collectors. Who knows.

Edited by biniou
Posted
On 11/02/2016 at 11:45 PM, TabbyBoy said:

In that case, I'll avoid anything with "B" in the code like the plague. Sorry but, I've yet to see any "quality" product made in China that meets my exacting standards. Nevertheless, I'll not be buying any Ewok Villages and I think a lot of people may get burned if they buy these in quantity but, that's just me (the person that bought hundreds of Mars Rovers & Research Institiutes).

Iphones and almost all other smartphones are made in china.

  • Like 5
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 14/2/2016 at 10:41 AM, chipbee said:

Iphones and almost all other smartphones are made in china.

not from a chiness company. no... theyre just labor, they don't own design nothing at all .. just copying in a crappy way quality products, which are not chiness

Edited by TargetZero
Posted
On 27/02/2016 at 9:52 PM, TargetZero said:

not from a chiness company. no... theyre just labor, they don't own design nothing at all .. just copying in a crappy way quality products, which are not chiness

TabbyBoy's post was slating Chinese manufacturing. Subsequent rebuttals concern this, not design.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...