roxio Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Pictures starting to surface on Facebook and it's tiny and woeful. No dewback. Tiny build, han, greedo, wuher and stormie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Val-E Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 11 minutes ago, roxio said: Pictures starting to surface on Facebook and it's tiny and woeful. No dewback. Tiny build, han, greedo, wuher and stormie All the better for 75052. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil B Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Set number anagrams! 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodeogeorge Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Pictures starting to surface on Facebook and it's tiny and woeful. No dewback. Tiny build, han, greedo, wuher and stormieAs long as we get another helicopter - I mean landspeedorzSent from my iPhone using Brickpicker Forum mobile app Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpinemaps Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 I was a bit shocked when I saw this thread come up. I would have sworn we had a thread for the Cantina. Then I realized what was going on. Geez...didn't the last one just retire? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nolanfan34 Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 I am the biggest Lego apologist there is, and think people overreact to the recycled set talk.....but good lord are you kidding me? This finally makes me mad if they really are re-releasing another cantina. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lazuli16 Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 4 minutes ago, nolanfan34 said: I am the biggest Lego apologist there is, and think people overreact to the recycled set talk.....but good lord are you kidding me? This finally makes me mad if they really are re-releasing another cantina. welcome to the club. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KShine Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 15 minutes ago, nolanfan34 said: I am the biggest Lego apologist there is, and think people overreact to the recycled set talk.....but good lord are you kidding me? This finally makes me mad if they really are re-releasing another cantina. Congratulations, it sounds like you've moved on to the next stage. Don't worry, one day soon - you too will become numb to these things. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HandyHand Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 OMG, that's pathetic! (both the new set, now that I've seen the picture of it, and the recycling of a pretty decent set into something not worth the packaging) ! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stackables Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 I have substantially reduced the amount of Star Wars sets I buy now. This is one of the main reasons. I want the Ahsoka figure in the frigate but hey I figured the same fig will be released in another set. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenix_2k1 Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Can't believe they've re-released but the poor set should be good news for anyone with 75052's to sell as that set is so much better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TabbyBoy Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 48 minutes ago, stackables said: I have substantially reduced the amount of Star Wars sets I buy now. This is one of the main reasons. I want the Ahsoka figure in the frigate but hey I figured the same fig will be released in another set. Same here and I've actually bought no Star Wars sets since I got back into the game this year. They need to be 75% off before it's worth my while unless it's UCS which I'll take at 50% off. I'm a huge fan of the Star Wars movies and characters, but I think most the sets suck these days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fossilrock Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 (edited) The set doesn't bother me. Just another TRU exclusive that you can add on to the original cantina and make an even bigger diaroma. Plus, it's got WUHER, and a cheaper way to get the Han Solo from the Death Star set! These TRU exclusives are usually take it or leave it... but i'll at least buy one when the 25% off deal hits in february. Edited December 11, 2017 by fossilrock 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zskid00 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 The set doesn't bother me. Just another TRU exclusive that you can add on to the original cantina and make an even bigger diaroma. Plus, it's got WUHER, and a cheaper way to get the Han Solo from the Death Star set!Agreed. I just wish there was another Cantina alien included. The opportunities to get them are few and far between. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t_mafia Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Nearly 400 pieces and $39.99 RRP? Probably has the weight of a 250 piece set from 2010. Best thing Lego does for themselves is publish the piece count instead of the weight on the box. More tiny pieces = more $$$ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will 4 Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 Now up on TRU https://www.toysrus.com/product?productId=137247256 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redghostx Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 Where is the rest of it? Sent from my Nexus 5 using Brickpicker Forum mobile app 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damnsanders Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 75052 blows this one out of the water. I was worried at first (sitting on a few 75052s) but after seeing this set, not anymore. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will 4 Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 Anyone kow that the white pod thingy is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil B Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 The big question I have after seeing the box art is: Who shot first? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliminator Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 2 hours ago, damnsanders said: 75052 blows this one out of the water. I was worried at first (sitting on a few 75052s) but after seeing this set, not anymore. Agreed. 75052 is a fantastic set. Has a little bit of everything... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fossilrock Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, Will 4 said: Anyone kow that the white pod thingy is? Ubrikkian 9000 Z001 landspeeder...http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/9000_Z001_landspeeder Edited December 13, 2017 by fossilrock 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HandyHand Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 9 hours ago, fossilrock said: Ubrikkian 9000 Z001 landspeeder...http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/9000_Z001_landspeeder This actually beats the Quadjumper for pointless LEGO model of a background object only visible in one movie for a few seconds! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenix_2k1 Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 12 minutes ago, Haay said: This actually beats the Quadjumper for pointless LEGO model of a background object only visible in one movie for a few seconds! That describes just about every Lego Batman Movie set lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cladner Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 first thought was unprintable. second lets turn that frown upside down thought was, can this somehow be added-on, incorporated into 75052's build to make it better or possibly 2x 75052 plus one of these? please, for the love of mercy, ANYTHING to make 75052 go up in price - worst sw performer of 2014 for sure. even lowly b-wing is clobbering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.