75205 - Mos Eisley Cantina (2018)

[roxio]

Pictures starting to surface on Facebook and it's tiny and woeful. No dewback. Tiny build, han, greedo, wuher and stormie

[Val-E]

11 minutes ago, roxio said:

Pictures starting to surface on Facebook and it's tiny and woeful. No dewback. Tiny build, han, greedo, wuher and stormie

All the better for 75052.

[Phil B]

Set number anagrams!

[Rodeogeorge]

Pictures starting to surface on Facebook and it's tiny and woeful. No dewback. Tiny build, han, greedo, wuher and stormie

As long as we get another helicopter - I mean landspeedorz


Sent from my iPhone using Brickpicker Forum mobile app

[Alpinemaps]

I was a bit shocked when I saw this thread come up.  I would have sworn we had a thread for the Cantina.

Then I realized what was going on.  Geez...didn't the last one just retire?

[nolanfan34]

I am the biggest Lego apologist there is, and think people overreact to the recycled set talk.....but good lord are you kidding me? This finally makes me mad if they really are re-releasing another cantina.

[lazuli16]

4 minutes ago, nolanfan34 said:

I am the biggest Lego apologist there is, and think people overreact to the recycled set talk.....but good lord are you kidding me? This finally makes me mad if they really are re-releasing another cantina.

welcome to the club.   

[KShine]

15 minutes ago, nolanfan34 said:

I am the biggest Lego apologist there is, and think people overreact to the recycled set talk.....but good lord are you kidding me? This finally makes me mad if they really are re-releasing another cantina.

Congratulations, it sounds like you've moved on to the next stage.

Don't worry, one day soon - you too will become numb to these things.

[HandyHand]

OMG, that's pathetic! (both the new set, now that I've seen the picture of it, and the recycling of a pretty decent set into something not worth the packaging) !

[stackables]

I have substantially reduced the amount of Star Wars sets I buy now.  This is one of the main reasons.  I want the Ahsoka figure in the frigate but hey I figured the same fig will be released in another set. 

[Fenix_2k1]

Can't believe they've re-released but the poor set should be good news for anyone with 75052's to sell as that set is so much better.

[Guest TabbyBoy]

48 minutes ago, stackables said:

I have substantially reduced the amount of Star Wars sets I buy now.  This is one of the main reasons.  I want the Ahsoka figure in the frigate but hey I figured the same fig will be released in another set. 

Same here and I've actually bought no Star Wars sets since I got back into the game this year. They need to be 75% off before it's worth my while unless it's UCS which I'll take at 50% off. I'm a huge fan of the Star Wars movies and characters, but I think most the sets suck these days.

[fossilrock]

The set doesn't bother me.  Just another TRU exclusive that you can add on to the original cantina and make an even bigger diaroma.  Plus, it's got WUHER, and a cheaper way to get the Han Solo from the Death Star set!  These TRU exclusives are usually take it or leave it... but i'll at least buy one when the 25% off deal hits in february.

Edited December 11, 2017 by fossilrock

[zskid00]

The set doesn't bother me.  Just another TRU exclusive that you can add on to the original cantina and make an even bigger diaroma.  Plus, it's got WUHER, and a cheaper way to get the Han Solo from the Death Star set!

Agreed. I just wish there was another Cantina alien included. The opportunities to get them are few and far between.

[t_mafia]

Nearly 400 pieces and $39.99 RRP? Probably has the weight of a 250 piece set from 2010. Best thing Lego does for themselves is publish the piece count instead of the weight on the box. More tiny pieces = more $$$

[Will 4]

Now up on TRU

https://www.toysrus.com/product?productId=137247256

[redghostx]

Where is the rest of it?

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Brickpicker Forum mobile app

[damnsanders]

75052 blows this one out of the water. I was worried at first (sitting on a few 75052s) but after seeing this set, not anymore.

[Will 4]

Anyone kow that the white pod thingy is?

[Phil B]

The big question I have after seeing the box art is: Who shot first?

[eliminator]

2 hours ago, damnsanders said:

75052 blows this one out of the water. I was worried at first (sitting on a few 75052s) but after seeing this set, not anymore.

Agreed. 75052 is a fantastic set. Has a little bit of everything...

[fossilrock]

2 hours ago, Will 4 said:

Anyone kow that the white pod thingy is?

Ubrikkian 9000 Z001 landspeeder...

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/9000_Z001_landspeeder

Edited December 13, 2017 by fossilrock

[HandyHand]

9 hours ago, fossilrock said:

Ubrikkian 9000 Z001 landspeeder...

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/9000_Z001_landspeeder

This actually beats the Quadjumper for pointless LEGO model of a background object only visible in one movie for a few seconds!

[Fenix_2k1]

12 minutes ago, Haay said:

This actually beats the Quadjumper for pointless LEGO model of a background object only visible in one movie for a few seconds!

That describes just about every Lego Batman Movie set lol

[cladner]

first thought was unprintable.

second lets turn that frown upside down thought was, can this somehow be added-on, incorporated into 75052's build to make it better or possibly 2x 75052 plus one of these?  

please, for the love of mercy,  ANYTHING to make 75052 go up in price - worst sw performer of 2014 for sure.  even lowly b-wing is clobbering.