Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I haven't seen anyone mention this major misstep with the new version:  Where's Obi-Wan's hood and cloak?   Lego not only was lazy but they actually screwed something up that was right with the original.  

Ben_Kenobi.png  

 

Edited by Mathew
Posted
19 minutes ago, Mathew said:

I haven't seen anyone mention this major misstep with the new version:  Where's Obi-Wan's hood and cloak?   Lego not only was lazy but they actually screwed something up that was right with the original.  

Ben_Kenobi.png  

 

 

The 10188 money % that was used for Kenobi's hood and robe was allocated for 75159 Han's new Dirk Diggler-like hair element.  You dim think that type of hair style comes cheap do you?

Seriously, yeah it's a slight miss but Lego went with the printed torso and leg look instead.  Oh well, that is the last mishap with this set ;)

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, Ed Mack said:

The review is pretty much spot on.  I will also be leaving bad reviews for this set.

arent we all? lets make this POS rate at half block on their site. the closer to 0 the better. we are the force to be reckon with

Edited by jerryherb
Posted
4 minutes ago, Sandwraith said:

Battle the Royal Guard in the throne room  

Ah yes i remember that scene... err... wait.. it's AOH's lookout tower all over again!

The only royal guard battle I recall is when Yoda smashed them in Sidious' chambers about 5 seconds into their fight in Sith.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, exciter1 said:

The only royal guard battle I recall is when Yoda smashed them in Sidious' chambers about 5 seconds into their fight in Sith.

Huh? Not sure what you were talking about. They were a bit annoying but not that hard to defeat :drag:  

 

  • Like 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Bold-Arrow said:

I might be in the minority here , but I think there should be a differentiation between the set being crap and what TLG did beign crap . I think the set looks pretty cool if that was an original design .

It looked cool when it was 10188.  75159 looks stupid. 

  • Like 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, Knightwing01 said:

am i the only one here who will actually buy it

2 to 3 years from now , many new Lego fans will actually buy it . It think it is rather too soon now as most folks do have the 10188 

Posted
21 minutes ago, Rodeogeorge said:

Am I the only one who prefers the old style minifigures?  The new ones are cool but the old simple ones have charm that the new ones lack.

Maybe I just like Old Style.

I absolutely prefer the old style minifigs - From an artful viewpoint, it is a more suitable match for the simplicity of the LEGO form.

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...