Jump to content

Outrage as Lego describe new toy character as a 'back-of-the-bus window licker'


Recommended Posts

While not many of us seem to have heard of it - it was easy to find the meaning of the term (which is pretty offensive).

Oversensitive or not - it was a pretty stupid thing for LEGO to let slip by. Plus, the one who wrote it for them must have known what it meant. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like someone used a term that they didn't understand. Ok, fine, remove the term and move on. OBVIOUSLY they were not TRYING to offend anyone.

​I don't see how someone could use a fairly obscure term like this, unless the did know what it meant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never heard the term before, but if it is indeed that offensive, it was a bad move. It got corrected. There very likely no intend here. Life goes on.

What I don't get is offended people that, instead of contacting Lego directly and have it removed more or less discretely, go out into the public and try to make a fuss. Is that necessary? Is that really the worst you can complain about? You must have a happy life then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never heard the term before, but if it is indeed that offensive, it was a bad move. It got corrected. There very likely no intend here. Life goes on.

What I don't get is offended people that, instead of contacting Lego directly and have it removed more or less discretely, go out into the public and try to make a fuss. Is that necessary? Is that really the worst you can complain about? You must have a happy life then.

​Some people just are not happy unless they are causing a big fuss and making "the man" look bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I don't get is offended people that, instead of contacting Lego directly and have it removed more or less discretely, go out into the public and try to make a fuss. Is that necessary? Is that really the worst you can complain about? You must have a happy life then.

​When people are mad and furious about something, the last thing that they think of is directly complaining to Lego. They will complain to everyone else, and then Lego will find out from the other people. I have seen this happen a lot of times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never heard of this term either, but, that said, Lego`s marketing/PR department should do better research. They are at fault for using a term they obviously did not understand, and that is frankly irresponsible. Honest mistakes happen, which this no doubt was, but, it is their job to avoid things like this from happening, by doing better research. 

Now that they removed it, people should probably recognize it as an error in judgement and leave it alone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

​When people are mad and furious about something, the last thing that they think of is directly complaining to Lego. They will complain to everyone else, and then Lego will find out from the other people. I have seen this happen a lot of times.

​Yes. And what did they accomplish? That a lot of people know a bad phrase they didn't know before. Great work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So when the article said it was voted the third most offensive term I was naturally curious what the others were. If you are also curious here's the link to the poll. Interesting results. 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/ouch/play/worst-words-vote.shtml

​Woa woa woa!!!

There are some quite strong terms there! Hope the forum can handle them and they will not all be seen as *****

  1. Retard - 19.6% (404 votes)
  2. Spastic - 18% (373 votes)
  3. Window-licker - 17%(350 votes)
  4. Mong - 13.4%(276 votes)
  5. Special - 10.2% (210 votes)
  6. Brave - 7.9% (163 votes)
  7. Cripple - 5.5% (113 votes)
  8. Handicapped - 2.5% (52 votes)
  9. Wheelchair-bound - 2% (42 votes)

So next time you call somebody brave, keep in mind that it has been voted the 6th most offensive word in 2003!

 

The problem with language ist that it starts out descriptive (neutral) and then becomes something else.

Fat people are FAT... that's purely descriptive... but they don't feel good about themselves if you call them FAT (maybe they should change something then...) so they are strong people... or whatever more positive sounding words people came up with.

 

Some words I can understand... but common... Handicapped?! What's wrong with that one? Wheelchair-bound??? Special...

 

I can understand how the term window-licker might be offensive though ;)

 

By the way: Since I'm not a native english speaker (you might say I'm a little bit handicapped here myself...)... maybe I cannot understand some things but: when has "Wheelchair-bound!" ever been used as offensive term by itself?

Edited by Locutus001
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...