Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is that 2 or 3 women in this set?  Or am I blind?

 

I cannot see Lego wanting to get into the women / men not producing enough controversy all over again.  I think they will move on.

I'm going with 2, I had to verify the lipstick on the 1 to confirm lol

Posted

It's an easy design, incredibly large support, no license, predecessor sold well. LEGO has little to no reason not to release it. LEGO is mostly afraid of new ideas being a failure. However now this venture has quite minimal risks. 

Posted

Is that 2 or 3 women in this set?  Or am I blind?

 

I cannot see Lego wanting to get into the women / men not producing enough controversy all over again.  I think they will move on.

 

At the same time, the demand is there and controversy can also be free publicity. I wouldn't count it out of the running from the review.

Posted (edited)

That is exactly why I think it is unfair to Lego and they are going to pass but that is just my opinion

 

Congrats other submissions with 10000 votes, you are officially victims of our PC world.  Have fun eating dirt  :assassin:

Edited by Darth_Raichu
Posted

I'll be disappointed if/when this is released instead of one of the many better and more original ideas that have been submitted.

If LEGO wants to release it it will, independently of other sets. What I gleaned from the decision process so far is that LEGO doesn't limit itself if it finds multiple sets good candidates, it evaluates them individually. Especially considering that most of the submitted concepts are infeasible as an Ideas release. I am sure that a potential release of this set wouldn't affect other projects.

Posted

That sure was quick. Do they typically achieve 10K that quick?

I know the Purdue Pete one achieved 10k really fast, but they never produced it.  I think that license would have been a goldmine for them with making licensed NCAA/NFL type mascots, but that's just me. 

 

As for this set, I like it about as much as RI, very little.  I'll get one to have it, but won't invest in it.  I thought figures like these was why they make the CMF line?

Posted (edited)

I know the Purdue Pete one achieved 10k really fast, but they never produced it.  I think that license would have been a goldmine for them with making licensed NCAA/NFL type mascots, but that's just me. 

 

As for this set, I like it about as much as RI, very little.  I'll get one to have it, but won't invest in it.  I thought figures like these was why they make the CMF line?

 

I think getting into bed with the nfl and ncaa would be worse than disney.  TLG already has one elephant to deal with, I dont think they want another. 

 

As for this set I cant see TLG not giving it a shot.  RI got a limited release initial, but was in so much demand they gave it a second round.  This seams like a no brainer, as a follow up.  I dont see the sex of the minifigures (huh what?), really effecting the decision much this time around.  they could even do it as 3 poly bags rather than 1 large set.

 

finally the only people on this site that do not want this to be release are the ones with no RI's in their stock rooms...

Edited by jay4e
Posted

Is that 2 or 3 women in this set?  Or am I blind?

 

I'm going with 2, I had to verify the lipstick on the 1 to confirm lol

 

I believe that it is a set with 3 female scientists. The reason that not all 3 figures have long hair and lipstick is that not all women have long hair and lipstick. I heard that this was one of the criticisms of the RI :)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...