Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I would not buy this set for investment purposes at this point.

Nothing cryptic here.

Posted

 

But it comes with a brick separator!

I'll probably buy two... one for us, one just for the risk. We are still missing the bakery so hopefully that one is re-released next year!! :devil:

You forgot the helicopter :(

LEGO could pull out a surprise and re-release the WV Post Office next year :D:D:D 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Yes, maybe they want to get families buildlng helicopters together this holiday season - they certainly have given us enough options.

Edited by valenciaeric
Posted

Every AFOL down in AFOLoville liked Christmas a lot.
But LEGO who lived just North of AFOLoville did not!

LEGO hated Christmas! The whole Christmas season!
Now, please don't ask why. No one quite knows the reason.

It could be, perhaps, that their bricks were too white.
It could be WALL-E's head wasn't screwed on just right.

But I think that the most likely reason of all
May have been that the new T1 box was two sizes too small.

But, whatever the reason, his boxes or his bricks
He stood there on Christmas Eve hating the Nic(o)s,

Staring down from his cave with a sour, LEGO frown
At the warm lighted windows below in their town,

For he knew every AFOL down in AFOLville beneath
Was busy now hanging a LEGO brick wreath.

"And they're hanging their stockings," he snarled with a sneer.
"Tomorrow is Christmas! It's practically here!"

Then he growled, with his LEGO minifigures nervously drumming,
"I must find some way to keep Christmas from coming!

  • Like 6
Posted

This is one of the few exceptions that I wish we would be an united sausage. Boycot this set!

I don't have the original so I realize I'm in a different group than many around here... but I also think the whole thing was overblown. The Technic Racing Truck 42041 was re-released right down to the same piece count but to much less fanfare. I realize different theme, different season, different target audience but still... it wasn't a widely hoarded or desired set so only a few people complained.

How dare LEGO ruin Christmas this year! See above.. :jester:

 

  • Like 4
Posted

It was a winner.  Listen people, many of you are here because you are looking for information about investment, reselling, collecting...not LEGO bricks as a simple toy or fun build.  I will tell you that if people go in heavy on this set, there will be ramifications later on. There are dozens of other sets that will be better investments than this one, so put your resources there.  If you want one to build and display, buy one...it's a great set.  

ramifications: (noun) TLG's *new* policy of re-releasing *many* popular exclusive sets from the past; a Lego investor's worst nightmare

  • Like 2
Posted

It was a winner.  Listen people, many of you are here because you are looking for information about investment, reselling, collecting...not LEGO bricks as a simple toy or fun build.  I will tell you that if people go in heavy on this set, there will be ramifications later on. There are dozens of other sets that will be better investments than this one, so put your resources there.  If you want one to build and display, buy one...it's a great set.  

I don't have one yet, so I'll be getting one for myself. Possibly one more, just because I have a recent affliction that prevents me from only buying one of any set I like.

As Ed might be alluding to above, one of the ramifications of the re-seller community going in hot and heavy is that it could distort the perceived immediate interest in this set and validate LEGO's move to re-release. Easy money is easy money. Why not churn out some of the other retired sets. Creator sets are good candidates because they tend to utilize common pieces.

We could help to bring about our own worst nightmare ;)

  • Like 3
Posted

Anyone who cares about Lego investing beyond the short term should boycott this set, except for one set for building.

Investing in this set is short sighted, selfish, and destructive.

well then there is that point of view

it is a point of view not the point of view

unless we are living in a dictatorship

Posted

Over the last year and half, I've been BL'ing the original Toy Shop.  I just finished up a couple of weeks ago.

I am not even buying one of these.  I want these to rot.

Everyone is entitled to do what they want, but I'm sitting this out because I don't like Lego re-issuing sets (not for investment reasons, and not for play reasons), and I don't want to encourage that by even buying one unit.

  • Like 7
Posted (edited)

I don't post here much, and I do like you trek, but I felt compelled to post on this topic because it really bothers me to see people saying they are investing in a reissue like this.

Reissues hurt the value of the original release and dilute the value of the entire brand.  Doesn't matter if it's a card, a figure, a statue, a Lego set or whatever, encouraging Lego to reissue sets by purchasing them in bulk is detrimental to the collectability of the brand.  Period.  There are a zillion precedents for it.

If you feel compelled to invest in WVTS, then I encourage you to take advantage of the dip in value of 10199 and buy a bunch of those instead.

Edited by JDLego324
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...